Opt-In Supporter Mallory Wall’s Letter Substitutes Emotion for Logic

No PARCC ing

Teacher Mallory Wall wrote a highly emotional letter that was printed in the March 8th Lake Charles paper. It was a loosely-organized indictment of the teaching profession, which seems odd coming from a teacher. (A link to the letter is below.)

It’s not just the letter’s poor logic that irritates; it’s the absence of logic entirely that offends.

Wall relayed an emotional story about a bright potential college student “full of hope and determination” from a rural parish. Somehow this female valedictorian could only score a 13 on her ACT, so she was appealing to still earn TOPS.

According to Wall, the student’s words were “full of emotion.” So were Wall’s. Too bad she substituted emotion for logic, for her words lacked a coherent train of thought.

Wall took this anecdotal story and then linked it with gossamer threads to blame the entire Louisiana public education system. Somehow this student’s situation gave Wall the right to accuse all teachers—nay, the entire state—of mass negligence: “Her teachers have failed her. Her state has failed her. We have failed her.”

Here is prudent advice for Wall: do not use tales to blame all teachers or this state. If Wall wants to accept blame for this student, she is certainly free to do so, but she has no right to spread her scapegoating blanket on others in the teaching profession.

Her irrational letter defames the character of thousands of hard-working teachers with an insupportable argument: students with low-ACT scores are PROOF that EVERYONE has failed them.

In twenty-four years of teaching, I have known brilliant students who were poor test takers. One valedictorian I taught never obtained the ACT score necessary for scholarships, but today is a successful doctor. Unlike Wall, I will not blame the entire profession because of his performance on one test.

Here’s an inconvenient fact: a low ACT score indicates that a student on a particular day did not do well, that is all. It is not concrete evidence that the teaching profession and/or the state neglected to do its duty.

ACT is merely one tool to gauge if a student is ready for college. It is NOT a tool that easily identifies if a student is ready for life. And here’s another shocking fact for Wall to absorb: not everyone is cut out for college, but they can be highly successful human beings.

Wall claims to know her students’ data, which is interesting considering that this is the first year of the new PARCC-like tests. Exactly what can she compare: last year, Louisiana field-tested a PARCC test designed by Pearson; this year we’re giving a PARCC-like test designed by Data Recognition Corp. Such an apples-to-oranges comparison is potentially fruitless.

Is this kind of thinking the best that Common Core supporters have to offer? No wonder there is a rising tide of outraged parents and educators against a set of standards designed by people with no experience in writing standards.

I have taught over 3,500 students in almost a quarter of a century. Many have been successes; some have not. To judge me by their results is akin to rating a dentist by the cavities in their patients’ mouths. It makes no sense.

I teach my students to never stereotype or scapegoat a group of people based on a single story. I will, however, call out any person who claims I’m a failure because of one story. For me, that’s personal.

Ms Wall's letter to editor



Filed under Uncategorized

5 responses to “Opt-In Supporter Mallory Wall’s Letter Substitutes Emotion for Logic

  1. I find no Mallory Wall on TeachLouisiana.net with regards to teaching credentials. Maybe Mallory goes by another name? Mallory, please advise.

  2. She is a mystery. Can’t find anyone named Mallory wall in Louisiana or associated w Louisiana. LinkedIn, Facebook etc.

  3. Hello Lee. Search under Mallory Wall Padgett.

  4. Um, SHE failed. No schoolteacher took that test for her.

    Though that being said, a 4.0 at Crappy High School is NOT worth the same to college admissions offices as a 3.8 at Elite Public High. It just isn’t. That leads me to believe there is more going on in this story than meets the eye.

    The most obvious statement I would make to this chick would be, “DUH, she can retake that test.” That she didn’t bother and is whingeing about it speaks volumes not just about her ability, but her determination.

  5. Ann Inquirer

    Protecting children is not logical, it is instinctual. I would worry less about logic and more about Common Core’s toxic content in the curricula itself as its Left-Islamic Axis is pulling the strings with brainwashing and tyranny. There are too many documented articles and homework assignments being posted on social media to not reveal the Alinsky strategy, as well as Islamic indoctrination in Pearson texts – google Saudi investment in Pearson – not to mention the data mining which keeps track of children and their social engineering to become the drone adults this axis wants – the destruction of America, especially Christian America, as we know it.

    The purpose of these scam tests are to fail the kids, It is a set up to make it look like the teachers and schools are failing, Then the for-profit charter schools and its CC approved teachers will be moved in which are not taxpayer accountable, with more Saudi and Wall St investment. It will be fait accompli for complete change in American’s minds through our children that America is or ever has been a great country.

    This is no tin foil hat, this is really happening. List of documentation here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s